Attention: The news contains a spoiler. In the story campaign Call of Duty: Modern Warfare There are situations that put the player in an uncomfortable position. One of them occurs during the assault on the house in Kamentaun, where a gamer can kill a mother, which is hiding behind her own child.
It is believed that every person in the house is a potential enemy. If you shoot at the girl, she will be expected to die, dropping a crying child. Your comrades scold you, but the game will not end there. One of the allies will raise the child and put him in the crib, and you can move on.
But if you decide to shoot a baby, the screen will darken even before you see the shot itself, and the inscription will come in front of you: "Children do not participate in hostilities". After that you will be thrown back to the nearest control point.
The catch is that, repeating the murder of the child over and over again, you will receive another inscription: “You are serious?" At the same time, the game will throw you out on the screen selection screen, forcing you to start the task again. Such a cruel "Easter".
It is not necessary to kill the baby yourself – you can just watch the video below.
October 27, 2019 Sapkovsky believes that the series "Witcher" may surpass the success of the "Game of Thrones"
October 27, 2019 The designer of all sorts of Dreams can someday go to PC
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare
The best comments
And if the baby were Russian and another Russian soldier, the capant-Cannibal, was growing from it, grassing children in Urzikstan? It could be shot? Mmmmmmmm .
Surprised that they write "you seriously?". With the number of cranberries that there is in the game, I expected the inscription “You are Russian?".
> Soldiers kill children in Urzikstan <br https://nonukcasinosites.co.uk/review/1red/ />> Children Pushing the soldier sharpeners
> Children do not participate in fighting
I was thinking of cutting out the analysis of each mission in Blozhika – specifically indicating where the insanity. To speak in detail to scold and praise (we are approaching objectively, but there is a good good in the single).
But I realized that the material would have to be crushed – it is really voluminous out.
The Russians have no need to do what they do in the game. They have no effect on them, why they do it. “Simply, because” is not a gray morality, it is the impotence of the screenwriter, or the real “provocation”, given that all aspects of the conflict in Syria Urzikstan is not just like that, the Russian Federation and the USA has its own interests there, but our troops there, on an official invitation, are, as it were, but the pindos really climb without an invitation. This is not even propaganda, it is really nonsense already. In the same old Modern Warfare, the Russians were bad, but not just from the ceiling, they showed a series of events there why this happened. Even in the mission with the airport there was a goal and motive. However, the plot of this game – I can neither understand nor justify.
But women can be killed – how you get out of the nursery, you sign an agreement that you allow yourself to kill yourself with a lined military.
What nonsense.
If you are already showing off your realism, it is better to show the military tribunals and the like.
Because this is a fiction from beginning to end? Because there are not attributed the actions of some people, others? Because there you have not shouted from each toilet of "such a spasey you have not seen yet. #Seriomoral "?
Boring somehow beat. It is necessary that after an attempt to kill the baby, the inscription “How can you, you are Russian appeared on the screen?". Well, to feel the whole grayness of morality.
And the new MW attributes real actions (. ), albeit in a fictional country who did not make them.
I especially spit as Russians are shown in the West, propaganda is propaganda. But if they do it so hacking and stupid, then why should I come to terms with? The original MW also showed the murder of civilians, and the murder of employees of the Ministry of Internal Affairs (and not SFB or the IDMD), but there was a motivation for this. I don’t like the mission of “No Russian”, but I understand the motivation and role of this mission in the plot.
It was worth IW only to show how Al Catala makes a terrorist attack in the same St. Petersburg 20 years ago and how after that Moscow blows the roof and it goes to take revenge Syria Urzikostan, I would understand the motivation of the anthonist of this part. And so I don’t understand her. They kill peaceful ones because they can because the Russians. They have no motivation. Even terrorists do all their shit based on ideology, but here is just a vacuum. An anthonist was needed, they drank Russians, but they did not bring motivation.
And this plot everyone ascends into the absolute, calling the best in the series? #Seriomoral
P.S. Multiplayer is just a bomb, especially against the background of Battlefield (Lord, am I really saying that?!). I hope in the next part Dice will show how to make single campaigns with the Russians as an antagonists (Bf3 hello!)
It looks like a cherry on a pile of feces, which is served on a silver service. We have a gray moral here, but the Russians are still evil urks who kill women and children, and you must save the good Sasovets of children.
Eh, you can already arrange competitions: who will more open Russia and Russian history: American games or Russian cinema? (not all, of course, but mainly large -budget)
And who else was shown bad? Americans?
Ter attack in London, discard the hostage with a bomb T.To. They could not save him, and so saved the other three.
Storming at home – you can kill there only those who have weapons, shot at an unarmed woman – on CT. Shot at the child – on CT.
The torture of the butcher with his family – to kill the butcher – please kill his family – do not even dare.
The road of death was suddenly hanged on Russians.
Judging by the map of Petrograd in the multipler, they really tried to replace Russia with Castovia, but then spat.
Who yourself? I don’t know what you have invented there, but the eating of babies and the raping of civilians are not included in my daily diet.
That is why, in the game, a whole mission where the Airborne Railway is trying to kill the 14 -year -old (or how old she is) a girl, and you play this small one, help the “good uncle” to fill up with a screwdriver of this russian.
When the Nazis grabbed the Communists, I was silent: I was not a communist.
When they planted the Social Democrats, I was silent: I was not a social democrat.
When they grabbed members of the trade union, I was silent: I was not a member of the trade union.
When they came for me, there was no one to stand up for me.
What’s wrong with you? Point to jamb is not justification. Or do you consider all the reviews justification? They themselves stated about gray morality, as a result, they simply took the Russian army (it was the army, not the rebels of the soldiers, in the English version they talk about the army of the Russian Federation, and not about the general) and attributed to them other people’s jambs, like the road of the death of the Americans. Where is the justification?
Advanced Warfare has passed today. And I’m wondering where all these indignant? Why no one says that in Advanced Warfare as the villains Americans, and the main Pindos, performed by Kevin Spacey, generally arranged the genocide of the population with the help of chemos. weapons!
Because in the AW the villain is not the American people completely and completely, but one concrete bad guy who fools or bribed his company employees? Once again: not the entire US Army, but Irons. And even the motivation was prescribed to him, because he goes to what he goes on, because his son died due to the fact that “the war is meaningless and merciless”.
Here, one of the topics was given as an example of Spec Ops: The Line, saying “the Americans are evil there, you are not indignant?". Yes, because suddenly in Sotl there is a really gray morality, in which there is a confrontation between not Americans (for all the good and against everything bad) and the “unnecessary of the country” (for all the bad, against all the good), and Walker, who makes incorrect decisions at separate moments, and as a result, goes to Kukhoy and Konrad – who officially went by Kukukha already by the beginning of the game of the colonel, neither a tumor Anttonist is not exposed to the hero, they do not say that “that side does what he does, because they are dirty, but the rest of the world will become unicorn, and the opposite to them is simply radishes because they are radishes”.
